What's in this guide
- What the Tamale Act actually is
- What it would change about cottage food
- Current law vs. the proposed law
- What it means for current Colorado sellers
- The revenue cap question (read this carefully)
- Safety, registration, and inspections
- Where the bill stands and what's next
- What TrueCottage will do if it passes
- Common questions
What the Tamale Act actually is
House Bill 26-1033 is a bipartisan bill that would significantly expand Colorado's Cottage Food Act. The shorthand name comes from one of the foods it would legalize for home sale: traditional tamales, which are perishable and contain meat, and which fall outside the current cottage food rules.
The bill is sponsored in the House by Rep. Monica Duran (D-Wheat Ridge) and Rep. Ryan Gonzalez (R-Greeley), with Sen. Byron Pelton and Sen. Robert Rodriguez carrying it in the Senate. It is modeled on similar laws already on the books in Arizona, Texas, and other states. Supporters frame it as an entrepreneurship and food-freedom bill, particularly for immigrant families and home cooks who already sell informally.
For the first time, a Coloradan would be able to legally sell a homemade tamale to a neighbor.
What it would change about cottage food
If passed and signed into law, the Tamale Act would, in broad strokes:
- Allow refrigerated foods to be sold under the cottage food framework. Today, cottage food is limited to shelf-stable items.
- Allow meat and meat-containing dishes like tamales, burritos, enchiladas, soups, and stews. Today, raw meat and meat-based prepared foods are excluded.
- Raise the revenue cap. The bill text describes the cap as $150,000 in gross revenues per calendar year "from the sale of each eligible food product," with annual inflation adjustments. Current law caps net revenues at $10,000 per eligible food product. (See the section below for the exact language and why we are being careful about it.)
- Create a state registry of home food producers, with a registration number issued by CDPHE before the producer can sell.
- Require additional food safety training covering time and temperature control, on top of the food handler course already required.
- Authorize random kitchen inspections by state or local health agencies, plus fines for violations and recovery of inspection costs.
It would not change the in-Colorado-only sales restriction, the labeling disclosure requirement, or the prohibition on selling to retail stores or wholesalers. Direct-to-consumer remains the model. Raw milk and alcoholic beverages remain excluded.
Current law vs. the proposed law, side by side
| Today (current law) | If HB26-1033 passes | |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerated foods | Not allowed | Allowed, with safety training |
| Meat-based dishes | Not allowed | Allowed (tamales, burritos, etc.) |
| Revenue cap (per bill text) | $10,000 net revenues per eligible food product, per year | $150,000 gross revenues per eligible food product, per year (inflation-adjusted). See cap section below. |
| Food safety course | Required (basic food handler) | Required, plus time/temperature control training |
| State registration | Not required | Required before selling |
| Kitchen inspections | None | Random inspections allowed |
| Fines for violations | Limited authority | Health agencies can issue fines and recover costs |
| In-state-only sales | Required | Required (no change) |
| Required label disclosure | Required | Required (no change) |
| Raw milk, alcohol | Excluded | Excluded (no change) |
What it means for current Colorado sellers
If you already sell baked goods, jams, granola, or other shelf-stable cottage food today, here is the honest read.
It opens up a much bigger product catalog
The biggest practical change is that you could legally add a real menu of perishable items to what you already make. A baker could add cream-filled pastries and cheesecakes. A jam maker could add chimichurri or salsa verde with proper acidity controls. A home cook could finally turn a tamale operation, a soup business, or a meal-prep service into a legal one. This is genuinely new ground in Colorado.
It comes with more responsibility
Refrigerated and meat-based foods carry real food safety risk. The bill matches that risk with new requirements: extra training, a state registration step, and the possibility of an unannounced kitchen inspection. For shelf-stable producers (cookies, jam, granola), the inspection probability is low because the risk is low. For tamale and meat producers, expect the inspection bar to be higher. That is the trade for the privilege.
The state-level rulemaking will take time
Even if the Senate passes the bill and the Governor signs it, CDPHE will need to write the actual regulations: which courses qualify, what the registration process looks like, what an inspection includes, what foods need what controls. A reasonable expectation is that the new rules will not be operational until late 2026 or early 2027. The "this is now legal" date in the news is not the "you can start tomorrow" date.
The revenue cap, in the bill's own words
News coverage of the Tamale Act has summarized the new cap a few different ways. Because the bill is still in process and could be amended, and because how the cap is structured matters a lot to producers planning a business, we want to stay as close as possible to what the bill text actually says rather than paraphrase it.
The current law (today) caps "net revenues of ten thousand dollars or less per calendar year from the sale of each eligible food product produced in the producer's home kitchen."
HB26-1033, as introduced, would change that text to read:
"...producers that earn gross revenues of one hundred fifty thousand dollars or less per calendar year from the sale of each eligible food product produced in the producer's home kitchen or a commercial, private, or public kitchen..."
Two things are clearly different: the cap rises from $10,000 to $150,000, and the basis changes from net to gross revenues. The phrase "each eligible food product" appears in both versions.
What we are not going to do here is tell you exactly what "each eligible food product" will mean in dollars for your specific operation. That phrase exists in current law and CDPHE has interpreted it in practice; whether the same interpretation carries forward, and how the new gross-revenue framing interacts with it, will depend on the final bill (the Senate may amend it) and on the regulations CDPHE writes if it becomes law.
If the cap structure matters to your business plan, read the official bill page directly, watch the Senate process, and verify the final answer with CDPHE once the rulemaking is done. Anything more specific from us right now would be a guess.
Safety, registration, and inspections
The Tamale Act tries to expand what's allowed without abandoning food safety. Three new mechanisms do that work.
Time and temperature control training
Producers selling temperature-sensitive foods would need to complete a food safety course that specifically covers time and temperature control. This is the part of food safety that prevents most foodborne illness in perishable foods: keeping cold foods cold, hot foods hot, and not letting them sit at room temperature for too long. Expect this to be available online and in person, similar to the current cottage food course.
State registration
Every producer would have to register with CDPHE before selling. The state would assign a registration number and maintain an electronic registry. This is the trade for not having to operate from a commercial kitchen: the state knows who you are and where to find you if there's a complaint or a recall.
Random inspections and fines
State or local health agencies would have the authority to inspect a producer's home kitchen at random, investigate complaints, issue fines for violations, and recover the cost of those inspections. This is the most contested provision in the bill. The Libre Initiative, despite supporting the broader bill, has flagged Fourth Amendment concerns about home kitchen searches. The Senate may amend this provision.
Where the bill stands and what's next
- Introduced: January 14, 2026
- Passed Colorado House: April 30, 2026
- Currently: In the Colorado Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee
- If it passes the Senate: Goes to Governor Jared Polis for signature. The Governor has publicly highlighted the bill, suggesting he is likely to sign it.
- If signed: CDPHE would draft implementing regulations. The framework is scheduled for legislative review and potential repeal in 2028, meaning the legislature is treating this as a multi-year experiment.
Realistic timeline: the Senate could vote in May or June. CDPHE rulemaking would take additional months after a signing. Producers should not expect to be selling tamales legally before late 2026 at the earliest, and possibly not until 2027.
What TrueCottage will do if it passes
If the Tamale Act becomes law, TrueCottage plans to support the new categories as soon as CDPHE's rules are in place. Practically, that means:
- New product categories on the marketplace for refrigerated and meat-based foods
- Updated seller onboarding to capture state registration numbers and time/temperature certifications
- Updated buyer-facing labels and allergen disclosures appropriate to the expanded product set
- Additional surface-level controls (e.g., shorter pickup windows for hot foods) to match the safety profile of the expanded categories
Until then, our seller catalog stays focused on the foods Colorado law currently permits: shelf-stable baked goods, jams, granola, candy, dried herbs, coffee, tea, nut butters, dried pasta, and honey.
If the Tamale Act becomes law, it will be one of the biggest expansions of home-based food entrepreneurship in Colorado history. We are watching it closely.
Common questions about the Tamale Act
What is the Colorado Tamale Act?
The Tamale Act (HB26-1033) is a bipartisan Colorado bill that would expand the Cottage Food Act to let home cooks legally sell refrigerated foods and meat-based dishes like tamales, burritos, and stews. It would also raise the revenue cap (per the bill text, from $10,000 in net revenues to $150,000 in gross revenues), require state registration with CDPHE, and authorize random kitchen inspections.
Has the Tamale Act passed in Colorado?
Not yet. HB26-1033 passed the Colorado House on April 30, 2026 and is currently in the State Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. If the Senate passes it, the bill would then go to Governor Polis for signature.
When would the Tamale Act take effect?
Even if the Senate passes the bill and the Governor signs it, CDPHE will still need to write implementing regulations. A realistic earliest date for legal sales of newly allowed foods is late 2026 to early 2027. Until then, current cottage food law applies.
What foods would the Tamale Act allow Colorado home cooks to sell?
If passed, the Tamale Act would allow refrigerated foods (cream-filled pastries, cheesecakes, dairy desserts, salsas) and meat-based dishes (tamales, burritos, enchiladas, soups, stews). Raw milk and alcoholic beverages would still be excluded. Sales would still be in-Colorado-only and labels would still need to carry the existing home-kitchen disclosure statement.
Sources and further reading
- HB26-1033 official bill page (Colorado General Assembly)
- Colorado Cottage Foods (CDPHE)
- CBS Colorado: Tamale Act passes Colorado House
- Colorado House Democrats: Tamale Act passes House
- Colorado Public Radio: Home kitchen business and the Tamale Act
- Governor Polis: Highlighting the Tamale Act
- BillTrack50: HB26-1033 detail